Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;14(3):e1005995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005995

Table 1. Average precision and recall results for bat search-phase call detection algorithms across three different test sets iBats Romania and Bulgaria; iBats UK; and Norfolk Bat Survey.

Detection Algorithms
BatDetect
Average Precision SonoBat SCAN’R Kaleidoscope Segment Random Forest CNNFAST CNNFULL
iBats (R&B) 0.265 0.239 0.189 0.299 0.674 0.863 0.895
iBats (UK) 0.200 0.142 0.144 0.324 0.648 0.781 0.866
NBP (Norfolk) 0.473 0.456 0.553 0.506 0.630 0.861 0.882
Recall at 0.95
iBats (R&B) 0 0.251 0 0 0.568 0.777 0.818
iBats (UK) 0 0 0 0 0.324 0.570 0.670
NBP (Norfolk) 0.184 0.470 0 0 0.049 0.781 0.754

Large numbers indicate better performance. Recall results are reported at 0.95 precision, where zero indicates that the detector algorithm was unable to achieve a precision greater than 0.95 at any recall level. The results for the best performing algorithm are underlined. Details of the test datasets and detection algorithms are given in the text.