Table 4. A comparison of point-of-care cathodic circulating antigen detection in urine (POC-CCA) and Kato-Katz (KK) diagnostic methods that were applied to samples collected from the community of Candeal, Estância, Sergipe, northeastern Brazil, November 2015 (n = 461).
POC-CCA positive | (%) | POC-CCA negative | (%) | Total | (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KK positive | 40 | (8.7) | 15 | (3.2) | 55 | (11.9) |
KK negative | 147 | (31.9) | 259 | (56.2) | 406 | (88.1) |
Total | 187 | (40.6) | 274 | (59.4) | 461 | (100.0) |