Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;17(1):444. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.444

TABLE 2.

Bland–Altman comparison of PIMA™ analysers versus National Health Laboratory Services versus FACS Calibur.

Measure of agreement PIMA analysers – NHLS PIMA analysers – FACS Calibur FACS Calibur – NHLS
Mean bias (± 1 s.d.) -12.78 ± 106.63 7.52 ± 59.26 -20.3 ± 97.97
95% CI bias -33.94–8.38 -4.24–19.28 -39.74 – -0.86
BA 95% LOA -226.04–200.48 -111.01–126.05 -216.23–175.63
% Similarity to predicate (%SIM Mean ± s.d.) 101.3 ± 15 103.1 ± 12.7 98.7 ± 11.9

NHLS, National Health Laboratory Services; BA, Bland-Altman; LOA, limits of agreement.

n = 100.