Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;17(1):444. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.444

TABLE 3.

Comparison of PIMA™ analysers versus National Health Laboratory Services as categorised by CD4+ T-cell counts.

Measure of agreement ≤ 350 cells/mm3 351 cells/mm – 500 cells/mm3 ≤ 500 cells/mm3§ > 500 cells/mm3 All CD4+ T-cell counts††
Median bias 21 13 21 -23 18
BA bias (± 1 s.d.) 32.9 ± 61.0 21.5 ± 90.8 30.1 ± 69.4 -36.1±150.04 17.5 ±93.8
95% CI bias 23.4–42.3 -3.5–46.6 20.8–39.4 -78.3–6.1 6.2–28.8
BA 95% LOA -89.2 –154.9 -160.0–203.0 -108.7–168.9 -336.2–263.9 -170.0–205.0
% Similarity to predicate (% SIM mean ± s.d.) 107.4 ± 15.2 102.7 ± 10.5 106.2 ± 14.35 97.97 ± 10 106 ± 15.5
%SIM CV 14.20% 10.20% 13.50% 10.20% 14.60%

BA, Bland-Altman; LOA, limits of agreement.

n = 164;

n = 53;

§

n = 217;

n = 51;

††

n = 268.