TABLE 1.
Summary of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of natural ingredients as hypopigmenting agents
NATURAL INGREDIENTS | STUDY | HYPOPIGMENTING MECHANISM | COMPARISON | PIGMENTATION DISORDER | CONCLUSION | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZELAIC ACID (AZA) | Randomized controlled, open-label trial (Farshi et al)2 | Mitochondrial oxidoreductase inhibition, DNA synthesis inhibition, Tyrosinase inhibition | 20% AzA vs. 4% hydroquinone cream | Melasma | Melasma responded better to AzA during second treatment month | IB |
Nonrandomized open-label trial (Kircik et al)3 | None | PIH | 15% AzA gel applied twice daily reduced PIH over 16 week period | IIA | ||
Controlled trial (Dayal et al)** | Glycolic acid peel with twice daily 20% AzA cream vs. 20% AzA cream | Melasma | At 12 weeks, AzA/glycolic acid combination has a statistically significant decrease in MASI score compared with AzA alone | IIA | ||
Controlled trial (Mazurek)*** | None | PIH | Dermocosmetics containing AzA showed improvement in pigmentation | IIA | ||
ALOESIN | Controlled Trial (Choi et al, 2002)7 | Tyrosinase inhibition, tyrosine hydroxylase, DOPA oxidase | Aloesin vs. Arbutin vs. Aloesin/Arbutin | UVR-induced hyperpigmentation | Dose-dependent suppression in pigmentation with application of aloesin; synergism between arbutin and aloesin | IIA |
MULBERRY | RCT (Alvin et al)11 | Tyrosinase inhibition, melanogenesis inhibition, ROS Scavenger | 75% mulberry extract | Melasma | Compared to placebo, 75% mulberry extract showed significant improvement in MASI score, average Mexamater measurements, and MelasQoL scores | IB |
LICORICE EXTRACTS | Split-face controlled clinical trial (Amer et al)17 | Tyrosinase inhibition (glabridin) | None | Melasma | Sixteen out of 20 patients had an “excellent response” to 20% liquitin cream applied BID for four weeks Glabridin was more efficacious compared to HQ | IIA |
Controlled Trial (Makino et al)15 | ROS cavenger (glabridin) | None | UVR-induced hyperpigmentation | Skin brightener containing glabridin was shown to be clinically efficacious | IIA | |
RCT (Costa et al)16 | Disperses melanin (liquiritin) | Cream with belides, emblica, and licorice vs. 2% HQ | Melasma | Although depigmentation was seen in both groups, no statistical difference in efficacy | IB | |
RCT (Zubair et al)10 | Disperses melanin (liquiritin) | 4% liquiritin vs. 2% liquiritin and HQ | Melasma | 4% liquiritin significantly more effective than combination group | IB | |
LIGNIN PEROXIDASE | RCT (Mauricio et al)18 | Oxidizes and breaks down melanin | Lignin peroxidase cream vs. placebo or 2% HQ | Mottled hyperpigmentation | According to Mexameter evaluation, lignin peroxidase had more rapid and observable skin-lightening effect compared to placebo or HQ | IB |
RCT/Split-face (Draelos et al, 2015)19 | Lignin peroxidase cream vs. none, lignin peroxidase cream vs. 4% HQ | Facial dyspigmentation | Lignin peroxidase was more effective than applying nothing at all based on dermatospectrophotometer. Lignin peroxidase was superior to 4% HQ in aesthetics when including skin texture, lack of clarity and radiance, roughness, and overall appearance. Parity was demonstrated between both agents when evaluating skin lightening efficacy. | IB | ||
KOJIC ACID (KA) | Prospective controlled study (Monteiro et al)21 | ROS scavenger, tyrosinase inhibition | 0.75% KA with 2.5% Vitamin C vs. 4% HQ | Melasma | Patients responded faster and better to HQ | IIA |
RCT (Draelos et al, 2010)63 | Compound (KA, emblica extract, glycolic acid) vs. 4% HQ | Facial dyschromia | Both treatment equally efficacious | IB | ||
RCT (Deo et al)22 | 1% KA vs. KA with 2% HQ vs, KA with 0.1% betamethasone vs. combination of products | Melasma | KA with HQ was most effective combination | IB | ||
NIACINAMIDE | RCT (Lee et al)23 | Inhibits melanosome transfer to keratinocytes | Cream containing 2% niacinamide with 2% tranexamic acid vs. vehicle control | Irregular facial hyperpigmentation | Niacinamide with TXA combination product showed efficacy | IB |
RCT (Castanedo-Cazares et al)24 | Niacinamide 4% vs. desonide 0.05% vs. control | Axillary hyperpigmentation | 4% Niacinamide with 0.05% desonide emulsion showed significant colorimetric improvement, though desonide alone was more effective | IB | ||
Open-label controlled trial (Farris et al)** | None | PIH | Skin brightening compound containing retinol 0.5%, niacinamide 4.4%, resveratrol 1%, and hexylresorcinol 1.1% improved hyperpigmentation | IIA | ||
ELLAGIC ACID | RCT (Ertam et al)29 | Tyrosinase inhibition | 1% arbutin vs. synthetic 1% ellagic acid vs. synthetic 1% ellagic acid with plant extracts containing natural ellagic acid | Melasma | All three treatments show efficacy | IB |
RCT (Dahl et al)30 | 0.5% ellagic acid combined with 0.1% salicylic acid vs. 4% HQ | Hyperpigmentation and dark spots | Based on clinical grading, physical measurement of spot size by Chroma Meter, and patient questionnaire analysis, the compound had comparable efficacy to HQ but better aesthetics | IB | ||
ARBUTIN | RCT (Ertam et al)32 | Tyrosinase inhibition | 1% arbutin vs. synthetic 1% ellagic acid vs. synthetic 1% ellagic acid with plant extracts | Melasma | All three treatments show efficacy | IB |
Single-group efficacy trial (Polnikorn et al)33 | None | Melasma | 7% alpha arbutin in conjunction with the MedLite C6 Q-switched Nd:YAG laser showed favorable results | IIB | ||
GREEN TEA | RCT (Syed et al)36 | Antioxidant | 2% analogue of green tea extract vs. placebo control | Melasma | 2% analogue of green tea extract in hydrophilic cream shows clinical efficacy | IB |
TURMERIC | RCT/split-face (Swanson et al)38 | Antioxidant | Turmeric extract cream formulation vs. unknown control | Facial hyperpigmentation | Formulation improved areas of hyperpigmentation by 14.16% (P<.0001) at four weeks | IB |
SOY | Controlled trial (Hermanns, 2000)52 | Anticarcinogenic (Isoflavones), inhibits melanosome transfer to keratinocytes (serine protease inhibitors) | Azelaic acid vs. glycolic acid vs. soy extract | Facial hypermelanosis | Soybean extract showed clinical efficacy based on video camera analysis | IIA |
Controlled trial (Pierard et al)53 | None; authors compared affected vs. unaffected areas | Melasma | Application of soy extract to melasma lesions once daily for 3 months led to an average reduction of hyperpigmentation of 12% | IIA | ||
RCT (Wallo et al)45 | Soy moisturizer vs. vehicle control | Facial photodamage | Application of soy-containing moisturizer improved mottled pigmentation, blotchiness, dullness, fine lines, overall texture, overall skin tone, and overall appearance | IB | ||
ASCORBIC ACID | Single group Efficacy Trial (Kim et al)56 | UVA-mediated catalase inactivation | Topical AA with trichloroacetic acid peel vs. trichloroacetic acid peel | Severe melasma | Melasma peel (alpha-hydroxy acid, AA, and oxygen) showed improvement in 95 percent of patients at eight weeks | IIB |
Controlled trial (Soliman et al)57 | Glutathione depletion, oxidant formation | Combined trichloroacetic acid peel and topical ascorbic acid vs. trichloroacetic acid peel | Bilateral epidermal melasma | According to digital photography and MASI score, combination product showed greater improvement | IIA | |
RCT/Split-face (Huh et al)59 | Nitrous oxide production | Vitamin C vs. distilled water | Melasma | After 12 weeks of vitamin C iontophoresis treatment, the colorimeter recorded a clinically significant reduction in luminance value on the treated side | IB | |
Single group efficacy Trial (Taylor et al)60 | ROS scavenger, tyrosinase inhibition | None | Melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation | Novel full-face iontophoresis mask and ascorbyl glucoside preparation over a 1 to 2 month period showed clinical efficacy. *In conjunction to the treatment, patients adhered to a regimen of mandelic/malic acid skin care regimen, broad-spectrum UVA/UVB sunblock, and basic sun protection. | IIB |
Level of evidence—IA: evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; IB: evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial; IIA: evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization; IIB: evidence from at least one other type of clinical study;
Dayal SS. Combination of glycolic acid peel and topical 20% azelaic acid cream in melasma patients: efficacy and improvement in quality of life. J Cosmetic Dermatol. 2016 Aug 8;
Mazurek K. Comparison of efficacy of products containing azelaic acid in melasma treatment. J Cosmetic Dermatol. 2016;15(3):269–282; PIH: post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation; MASI: Melasma Area Severity Index; UVR: Ultraviolet radiation; MelasQoL: The Melasma Quality of Life Scale; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; ROS: reactive oxygen species; HQ: hydroquinone
Level of evidence—IA: evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; IB: evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial; IIA: evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization; IIB: evidence from at least one other type of clinical study;
Farris PP. Efficacy and tolerability of a skin brightening/anti-aging cosmeceutical containing retinol 0.5%, niacinamide, hexylresorcinol, and resveratrol. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(7):863–868;PIH: post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; ROS: reactive oxygen species; HQ: hydroquinone; TXA: tranexamic acid
Level of evidence—IA: evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; IB: evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial; IIA: evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization; IIB: evidence from at least one other type of clinical study; Nd:YAG: neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; HQ: hydroquinone
Level of evidence—IA: evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; IB: evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial; IIA: evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization; IIB: evidence from at least one other type of clinical study; RCT: randomized controlled trial; UVA: ultraviolet A; UVB: ultraviolet B MASI: Melasma Area Severity Index