Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 27;68(25):2871–2886. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.079

TABLE 1.

Criteria for Defining a Variant as Pathogenic

Criterion Description and Significance
Nonsynonymous genetic variant A genetic variant that alters the amino-acid sequence
Expression Confirmation that the protein product of the gene is expressed in diseased tissue
Unbiased genetic analysis Genome-wide analysis (linkage analysis, genome-wide association study, whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing) reduces the possibility of identifying a coincidental and unrelated mutation or a disease modifying mutation
Conservation Conservation of the affected amino acid in different species through evolution suggests a critical biological role of that particular residue
Control population Absence from a large number of unaffected controls, or confirmation of very low minor allele frequency in a population of interest demonstrates that the mutation is unlikely to be a polymorphism unrelated to the disease
Cosegregation Demonstrates that the mutation is found in those with disease only (note: incomplete and age-dependent penetrance is common); identification of the disease phenotype in those without the mutation proves nonpathogenicity
Multiplicity of events Demonstration that a variant may be causal in ≥2 unrelated probands greatly increases confidence in pathogenicity
Animal models Recapitulation of the disease phenotype by the variant in animals genetically engineered to express the mutation strongly supports causality