Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;7:e31949. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31949

Table 4. All learning models fitted (bold: winning model; AL - action-learning; SL - state-learning, F - variational Bayesian approximation to the model’s marginal likelihood, used for model comparison).

Experiment 1 (Instrumental sessions)
Choice F (n=19, sum [sem]) SCR F (n = 15, sum [sem])
TD -1330.920 [3.604] RW - value −1079.153 [8.024]
Hybrid (AL) -1345.667 [3.664] Hybrid (SL) - value −1077.911 [8.059]
WSLS -1486.723 [3.973] Hybrid (SL) - associability −1077.699 [8.003]
Experiment 1 (Pavlovian sessions)
Choice (not available) SCR F (n = 15, sum [sem])
N/A RW - value −1101.079 [7.132]
Hybrid (SL) - value −1096.250 [7.195]
Hybrid (SL) - associability −1095.135 [7.106]
Experiment 2 (Instrumental sessions, Pavlovian not available)
Choice F (n=23, sum [sem]) SCR F (n = 20, sum [sem])
TD -3572.476 [8.736] RW - value −7867.834 [60.668]
Hybrid (AL) -3626.478 [8.946] Hybrid (SL) - value −7857.341 [60.643]
HMM -3571.020 [9.067] Hybrid (SL) - associability −7841.864 [60.838]
Bayesian Hierarchical -3784.372 [8.616]