Table 3.
HCV genotype (reference methoda) | Patients, n | HCV genotype | HCV subtype | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sentosa SQ HCV Genotyping Assay | VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 LiPA | Sentosa SQ HCV Genotyping Assay | VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 LiPA | ||||||
Concordant n (%) | Discordant n (%) | Concordant n (%) | Discordant n (%) | Concordant n (%) | Discordant n (%) | Concordant n (%) | Discordant n (%) | ||
1 | 46 | 45 (97.8%) | 1 (2.2%) | 46 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 34 (73.9%) | 12 (24.1%) | 39 (84.8%) | 7 (15.2%) |
2 | 11 | 11 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (36.4%) | 7 (63.6%) | 8 (72.7%) | 3 (27.3%) |
3 | 14 | 14 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 14 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 14 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (92.3%) | 1 (7.7%) |
4 | 17 | 17 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 17 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 16 (94.1%) | 1 (5.9%) | 8 (47.1%) | 9 (52.9%) |
5 | 2 | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
6 | 5 | 5 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (1000%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (60%) | 2 (40%) |
2k/1b* | 4 | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) |
Total | 99 | 98 (99.0%) | 1 (1.0%) | 99 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 79 (79.8%) | 20 (20.2%) | 73 (73.7%) | 26 (26.3%) |
aIn addition to Sanger sequencing of the NS5B region, E1 region sequencing was used in 4 patients infected with a 2k/1b recombinant strain.
*These strains were identified as recombinant due to the discrepancy between their initial assignment based on the Lipa assay and NS5B sequencing. Recombination was confirmed by sequence analysis of the E1 region spanning the recombining region. Sentosa SQ HCV Genotyping Assay correctly identified genotype 1b in the NS5B region. VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 LiPA correctly identified HCV genotype 2 by means of its 5’NCR probes but failed to correctly identify subtype 2k.