Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 9;11:60. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1061-8

Table 1.

Cellular characteristics of N. oceanica and Phaeodactylum tricornutum

Species P. tricornutum N. oceanica
Treatment N+ N− A A+W N+ N− A A+W
Cell abundance (×106 cells mL−1) 20.4 6.25 11 10 48.1 24.5 5.64 36.1
µmax (day−1) 0.35 (± 0.02) 0.21(a) (± 0.02) 0.29 (± 0.03) 0.29 (± 0.02) 0.42 (± 0.01) 0.29(a) (± 0.03) 0.38(b) (± 0.03) 0.36(b) (± 0.02)
POC (µg mg−1) 328.4 (± 21.7) 310.6 (± 24.2) 345.5 (± 32.1) 288.9 (± 7.9) 503.2 (± 7.9) 590.1(a) (± 8.8) 576.2(a) (± 1.0) 534.8 (± 18.6)
PON (µg mg−1) 32.8 (± 1.6) 20.3(a) (± 0.9) 28.5(b) (± 1.0) 26.5(a, b) (± 1.0) 48.4 (± 0.6) 23.0(a) (± 1.0) 43.1(b) (± 0.6) 45.2(b) (± 2.2)

Maximum growth rate (µmax), cell abundance, particulate organic carbon (POC) and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) are compared for the two species in the four conditions tested [nitrate (N+), nitrogen free (N−), ammonium (A) and ammonium with tungstate (A+W) conditions]. Mean (± standard error) values are given. Analysis of the variance followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (p value < 0.05) was carried out to estimate the significance of the differences between treatments, being (a) significant difference when comparing to the N+ treatment, (b) significant difference when comparing to the N− treatment