Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 16;15(4):5425–5432. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8077

Table II.

Multivariate Cox regression analyses of OS and PFS for patients with cervical cancer.

OS PFS


Prognostic variables HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Age (>50 vs. ≤50 years) 2.272 (0.820–6.297) 0.115 2.273 (0.888–5.817) 0.087a
SCC level (>1.5 vs. ≤1.5 ng/ml) 1.624 (0.163–4.673) 0.542 1.984 (0.354–4.763) 0.733
FIGO Stage (>I vs. ≤I) 1.506 (0.590–3.846) 0.392 1.258 (0.535–2.960) 0.599
Tumor size (>4 vs. ≤4cm) 1.258 (0.509–3.109) 0.619 1.090 (0.456–2.607) 0.846
Differentiation (Grade 3 vs. 1/2) 1.045 (0.416–2.621) 0.926 1.516 (0.633–3.630) 0.350
Histological type (SCC vs. AC) 2.906 (1.013–8.339) 0.057 2.129 (0.782–5.792) 0.139
LN Metastasis (+ vs. -) 4.078 (1.755–9.474) 0.001 3.454 (1.579–7.559) 0.002a
Msi2 expression (high vs. low) 3.105 (1.139–8.465) 0.027 3.181 (1.274–7.941) 0.013a
a

P<0.05; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Msi2, Mousasi 2; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; AC, adenocarcinoma; LN, lymph node.