Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Water Secur. 2017 Nov 16;2:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.09.001

Table 3.

Advancing methods for assessing political institutions and processes as dimensions of household water insecurity

HWI Concept Water governance Laws & Institutions Informal Processes
Common methods Participant-observation, Interviews, Critical discourse analysis, Text analysis, Surveys, Oral histories, Statistical analysis Methods aligned with Institutional Analysis & Development Framework; Legal & institutional analysis Ethnography, Archives, Interviews; Narrative, Interpretive & Critical Analysis; Participatory methods
Purpose or use of common methods Discover how water governance produces water insecurity; Examine inequalities; Compare impacts of different governance regimes on HH Determine how formal laws & institutions contribute to or mitigate HWI Determine how informal rules or intermediaries contribute to or mitigate HWI
Is the household (HH) typically the unit of analysis? No. Data is typically at higher scales. Some methods can disaggregate to HH No, but HH level effects can be tracked with a variety of methods No, but HH effects can be assessed; May need new methods to improve HH measures
Recommended HWI approaches & methods that need further development Why new approaches or methods are needed Causal loop diagramming, Framework method, Q-Methodology To systematically track perspectives among key actors; Facilitate cross-site comparisons; Disaggregate to HH level Agent-based modeling, Cultural Consensus Analysis To produce data on hard-to-document norms and shared knowledge; Need to disaggregate to HH level Social Network Analysis To improve precision on analysis of informal flows of resources, influence & knowledge; Need to disaggregate at HH level