Table 3.
Advancing methods for assessing political institutions and processes as dimensions of household water insecurity
| HWI Concept | Water governance | Laws & Institutions | Informal Processes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Common methods | Participant-observation, Interviews, Critical discourse analysis, Text analysis, Surveys, Oral histories, Statistical analysis | Methods aligned with Institutional Analysis & Development Framework; Legal & institutional analysis | Ethnography, Archives, Interviews; Narrative, Interpretive & Critical Analysis; Participatory methods |
| Purpose or use of common methods | Discover how water governance produces water insecurity; Examine inequalities; Compare impacts of different governance regimes on HH | Determine how formal laws & institutions contribute to or mitigate HWI | Determine how informal rules or intermediaries contribute to or mitigate HWI |
| Is the household (HH) typically the unit of analysis? | No. Data is typically at higher scales. Some methods can disaggregate to HH | No, but HH level effects can be tracked with a variety of methods | No, but HH effects can be assessed; May need new methods to improve HH measures |
| Recommended HWI approaches & methods that need further development Why new approaches or methods are needed | Causal loop diagramming, Framework method, Q-Methodology To systematically track perspectives among key actors; Facilitate cross-site comparisons; Disaggregate to HH level | Agent-based modeling, Cultural Consensus Analysis To produce data on hard-to-document norms and shared knowledge; Need to disaggregate to HH level | Social Network Analysis To improve precision on analysis of informal flows of resources, influence & knowledge; Need to disaggregate at HH level |