Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 9;13(3):e0194008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194008

Table 3. Comparison of results of QT interval restitution against electrocardiographic parameters at baseline HR.

Absolute change in value % change in value
Horse ΔHR (bpm) ΔBCL (ms) Δ(QT interval) (ms) Δ(TQ interval) (ms) % change in HR % change in BCL % change in QT interval %change in TQ interval
34 75.0 1152.4 201.0 969.2 212.0 67.9 39.9 80.1
39 65.1 1049.9 124.7 939.0 177.9 64.0 25.9 80.1
44 82.6 1304.7 191.9 1113.9 251.2 71.5 38.4 84.0
46 136.1 1189.7 233.5 1001.9 347.6 77.7 50.4 89.9
52 129.8 1397.8 172.0 1237.3 381.8 79.2 40.1 91.9
56 94.1 1499.7 193.1 1316.6 310.9 75.7 40.1 87.2
67 90.1 2152.2 196.3 1975.8 403.2 80.1 37.9 90.3
Mean (±SEM) 96.1± 10.2 1392.4 ± 139.1 187.5 ± 12.5 1221.9± 136.4 297.8 ± 32.6 73.7 ± 2.3 38.9 ± 2.7 86.2 ± 1.8