Skip to main content
. 2018;19(1):171–177. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.1.171

Table 3.

Relationship between Clinicopathological Parameters and Immunohistochemical Expression of Cox-2 and VEGF in the Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cox-2 VEGF
Neg n (%) Pos n (%) p Neg n (%) Pos n (%) p
Gender (n=28) NS NS
 Male 4 (14.29) 19 (67.86) 13 (46.43) 10 (35.71)
 Female 1 (3.57) 4 (14.29) 2 (7.14) 3 (10.29)
Age (n=28) NS NS
 ≥60 2 (7.14) 14 (50.00) 9 (32.14) 7 (25.00)
 <60 3 (10.71) 9 (32.15) 6 (21.43) 6 (21.43)
Surgical margin (n=28) NS NS
 compromised 0 (0.00) 9 (32.10) 1 (3.57) (28.60)
 Not compromised 5 (17.90) 14 (50.00) 1 (3.57) 18 (64.30)
Lymph node status (n=20) NS NS
 Positive 0 (0.00) 7 (35.00) 1 (5.00) (30.00)
 Negative 4 (20.00) 9 (45.00) 1 (5.00) 12 (60.00)
Tumor differentiation (n=28) NS NS
 well-differentiated 0 (0.00) 5 (17.85) 1 (3.57) 3 (10.72)
 moderatelydifferentiated 5 (17.86) 14 (50.00) 2 (7.14) 17 (60.71)
 undifferentiated 0 (0.00) 4 (14.30) 0 (0.00) 5 (17.86)
Follow-up (n=28)
 Live without disease 5 (21.74) 4 (17.39) <0.05 3 (10.71) 6 (21.42) <0.05
 Live with disease 2 (7.14) 1 (3.57) 3 (10.71) 0 (0.00)
 Death by cancer 8 (34.78) 6 (26.09) 5 (17.85) 9 (32.14)
 Lost 2 (7.14) 0 (0.00) 2 (7.14) 0 (0.00)

Negative expression. Cox-2 has a better prognosis; Positive VEGF has a worst prognosis; NS, notsignificant.