Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 22;9(15):11999–12008. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23813

Table 3. Comparison of tumor texture analysis parameters between TRG1-2 and TRG3-5 groups.

TRG
Parameters TRG1–2(n = 30) TRG3–5(n = 29) p
pre-mean value 226.42(165.19–284.39) 239.08(170.24–288.02) 0.50
pre-SD 40.72(32.42–61.49) 47.51(35.76–59.27) 0.40
pre-skewness 0.30(0.10–0.63) 0.22(0.04–0.40) 0.36
pre-kurtosis 3.5734(3.24–4.25) 3.24(2.88–3.69) 0.02
pre-uniformity 0.80(0.78–0.84) 0.79(0.77–0.82) 0.51
pre-energy 0.72(0.45–0.95) 0.49(0.40–0.84) 0.09
pre-entropy 0.88(0.20–1.52) 1.41(0.57–1.61) 0.12
early mean value 207.80(160.10–243.40) 208.80(169.88–310.87) 0.64
early SD 51.97(34.99–65.38) 44.67(36.47–63.98) 1.00
early skewness 0.21(0.01–0.49) 0.23(-0.08–0.35) 0.63
early kurtosis 3.11(2.75–3.55) 2.89(2.62–3.33) 0.16
early uniformity 0.77(0.72–0.81) 0.77(0.73–0.79) 0.89
early energy 0.70(0.52–0.91) 0.68(0.41–0.89) 0.52
early entropy 0.92(0.36–1.33) 1.04(0.45–1.61) 0.51

TRG indicates tumor regression grade. Data are reported as mean (95% Confidence Interval). Significant differences are represented in bold.