Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2017 Sep 11;41(2):152–159. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9883-6

Table 3. Bootstrapped confidence intervals (CIs) for each variable as mediators of the relationship between prior success with dietary change and end-of-treatment outcome.

95% CI p-value
Model 1 (Baseline variables)
 TSRQ – Autonomous motivation (-0.19, 0.34) .79
 TSRQ - Amotivation (-0.38, 0.26) .89
 WEL - Negative Emotion (-0.74, 0.23) .39
 WEL - Physical Discomfort (-0.20, 0.87) .29
Model 2 (Change during treatment)
 WEL - Negative Emotion (-1.36, 0.13) .16
 WEL - Physical Discomfort (-0.88, 0.51) .53
 Attendance (-1.81, -0.17) .03

All models include gender as a covariate. Model 2 utilizes change from baseline to mid-treatment (six months) as a mediator of end-of-treatment (one year) outcome.