Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 7;22(3):343–354. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2

Table 1.

Background characteristics of pregnant women who were offered counseling about prenatal screening

Web application registrations June 2008–December 2010 (n = 30,549) Exact numbers (n = 60,038)a
N % Median (range) N %
Age (years) 30,095 30 (11–50)
 ≤19 550 2
 20–29 13,394 44
 30–39 15,375 51
 40–50 776 3
Age category
 <36 25,911 86b 47,791 80
 ≥36 4184 14 12,247 20
Ethnic origine 6083 17,990c
 Dutch 4018 66 11,133 62
 Surinamese 187 3 817 5
 Antillean 150 2 484 3
 Cape Verdean 64 1 187 1
 Turkish 307 5 974 5
 Moroccan 470 8 1116 6
 Other 887 15 3279 18
Generatione 6083 17,990c
 First-generation immigrants 1880 31 4430 25
 Second-generation immigrants 185 3d 2427 13
 Native Dutch 4018 66 11,133 62
Parity 30,229 1 (0–14)
 Nulliparity 15,065 50
 Multiparity 1–3 14,635 48
 Multiparity 4–14 529 2
Gravidity 30,182 2 (0–20)
 1–2 pregnancies 21,707 72
 >2 pregnancies 8475 28
Gestational age (first booking visit) 29,007 9 (5–41)
 0–11 weeks (on time) 22,894 79
 12–41 weeks (too late) 6113 21
Dutch language proficiency level 28,043
 Absent 583 2
 Limited 1259 5
 Fluent 26,201 93
Urbanity 30,549
 Not or less urban 6397 21
 Moderately urban 4841 16
 Highly urban 19,311 63

aExact numbers of mothers that gave birth to a living child in the study area from June 2008 to December 2010 [Data request, CBS Statistics Netherlands 2013]

bHigher representation of pregnant women <36 years old due to more inclusion by midwifery practices (low risk population)

cExact ethnicity distribution for the study area. To make the study outcomes comparable with the denominator data, only 9 months of the year 2010 were explored

dUnder-reporting second generation caused by the strict definition of second generation (country of birth of the pregnant women and both partners most be known)

eEthnicity and immigrant generation variables only registered from April 2010 to December 2010

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure