Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 7;22(3):343–354. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2

Table 3.

Multivariate association between background characteristics and provision and intentional participation in prenatal screening with CT and FAS

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
Information offer CT Counseling desired CT Information offer FAS Counseling desired FAS Counseling CT Counseling FAS Intention to participate in CT Intention to participate in FAS
n = 5386 n = 5189 n = 5429 n = 5312 n = 5056 n = 4927 n = 5425 n = 5422
OR CI (95%) OR CI (95%) OR CI (95%) OR CI (95%) OR CI (95%) OR CI (95%) OR CI (95%) OR CI (95%)
Age * * * * * *
 30–39 Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 ≤19 0.41 (0.24–0.70) § 0.96 (0.59–1.57) 0.73 (0.29–1.85) 0.85 (0.30–2.40) 0.85 (0.51–1.39) 0.96 (0.57–1.63) 0.21 (0.10–0.45) § 0.37 (0.22–0.61) §
 20–29 0.87 (0.71–1.05) 0.82 (0.72–0.93) 1.00 (0.76–1.34) 1.21 (0.90–1.64) 0.85 (0.75–0.97) 0.73 (0.64–0.85) § 0.33 (0.29–0.39) a 0.76 (0.64–0.91)
 40–50 0.36 (0.22–0.57) § 0.91 (0.59–1.40) 0.45 (0.23–0.91) 0.75 (0.32–1.76) 0.58 (0.39–0.86) 1.32 (0.86–2.03) 2.18 (1.49–3.19) § 0.72 (0.42–1.22)
Urbanity * * * * * *
 Highly urban Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Moderately urban 1.05 (0.82–1.36) 0.75 (0.64–0.87) § 0.90 (0.63–1.30) 0.65 (0.45–0.95) 0.64 (0.45–0.75) § 1.05 (0.90–0.23) 0.68 (0.58–0.80) § 0.56 (0.56–0.68) §
 Not or less urban 1.08 (0.81–1.46) 0.62 (0.52–0.75) § 0.65 (0.45–0.96) 0.39 (0.27–0.58) § 0.79 (0.64–0.97) 0.06 (0.04–0.10) 0.55 (0.44–0.68) § 0.90 (0.69–1.16)
Ethnicity * * * *
 Dutch Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Surinamese 0.61 (0.32–1.18) 1.42 (0.85–2.36) 1.11 (0.36–3.48) 1.84 (0.44–7.69) 1.22 (0.72–2.09) 0.31 (0.16–0.60) § 0.40 (0.21–0.75) 0.81 (0.43–1.54)
 Antillean 0.56 (0.28–1.14) 0.94 (0.55–1.60) 1.07 (0.31–3.66) 0.85 (0.23–3.08) 0.66 (0.38–1.14) 0.44 (0.22–0.87) 0.25 (0.11–0.55) § 1.64 (0.71–3.76)
 Cape Verdean 0.78 (0.31–1.98) 2.48 (1.09–5.68) 1.20 (0.24–6.06) n.a n.a 1.82 (0.79–4.18) 0.29 (0.12–0.70) 0.7
5
(0.35–1.63) 1.26 (0.45–3.49)
 Turkish 0.74 (0.39–1.35) 1.09 (0.70–1.71) 1.05 (0.39–2.85) 1.24 (0.40–3.82) 1.05 (0.66–1.68) 0.47 (0.25–0.85) 0.39 (0.22–0.71) 0.85 (0.47–1.51)
 Moroccan 0.60 (0.34–1.05) 0.83 (0.55–1.26) 1.08 (0.43–2.76) 0.89 (0.33–2.42) 0.81 (0.53–1.26) 0.30 (0.16–0.54) § 0.14 (0.07–0.27) § 0.94 (0.54–1.63)
 Other 0.67 (0.38–1.16) 1.59 (1.05–2.40) 0.89 (0.38–2.17) 1.20 (0.45–3.19) 1.11 (0.73–1.70) 0.49 (0.28–0.85) 0.90 (0.55–1.47) 0.91 (0.54–1.54)
Generatione *
 Native Dutch Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 First 0.74 (0.40–1.35) 0.84 (0.57–1.24) 0.81 (0.34–1.92) 0.85 (0.33–2.21) 0.90 (0.60–1.36) 1.91 (1.11–3.30) 1.04 (0.63–1.70) 1.04 (0.63–1.72)
Language proficiency level (LPL) * * * * *
 Fluent Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Limited 0.55 (0.37–0.82) 0.76 (0.57–1.01) 0.61 (0.36–1.03) 0.98 (0.49–1.95) 0.75 (0.56–1.00) 0.90 (0.65–1.24) 0.46 (0.31–0.68) § 0.49 (0.35–0.69) §
 Absent 0.38 (0.23–0.61)§ 0.45 (0.31–0.63) § 0.40 (0.23–0.71) 0.45 (0.23–0.91) 0.48 (0.38–0.68) § 0.74 (0.48–1.15) 0.48 (0.30–0.77) 0.45 (0.30–0.37) §

Adjusted for all predictor variables in the table

CT combined test, FAS fetal anomaly scan

Bold is significant: *Significant difference p < 0.05 within predictor variable; p < 0.05; p < 0.01; §p < 0.001

Results of second-generation immigrants were not applicable

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure