Table 4.
Intentional participation of ethnicity and language groups after adequate information provision prenatal screening with CT and FAS
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Information offer CT | Counseling desired CT | Counseling CT | Intention to participate in CT | ||||
Yes n (%)g | OR CI (95%)h | Yes n (%)a, g | OR CI (95%)h | Yes n (%)b, g | Yes n (%)c, g | OR CI (95%)h | ||
Ethnicityd, e | ||||||||
Native/Western | 3877 | 3606 (93) ‡ | Ref | 2761 (77) † | Ref | 2653 (96) | 879 (32) ‡ | Ref |
Non-Western | 889 | 756 (85) | 1.05 (0.65–1.71) | 571 (76) † | 0.70 (0.46–1.05) | 538 (94) | 64 (11) ‡ | 1.61 (0.84–3.10) |
Languagef | ||||||||
Fluent | 25,244 | 22,720 (90) ‡ | Ref | 16,997 (75) † | Ref | 16,638 (98) | 4977 (46) ‡ | Ref |
Limited/absent | 1723 | 1310 (76) ‡ | 0.44 (0.33–0.58) § | 1019 (78) † | 0.62 (0.49–0.79) ‡ | 988 (97) | 167 (27) ‡ | 1.93 (1.29–2.88) |
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Information offer FAS | Counseling desired FAS | Counseling FAS | Intention to participate in FAS | ||||
Yes n (%)g | OR CI (95%)h | Yes n (%)a, g | OR CI (95%)h | Yes n (%)b, g | Yes n (%)c, g | OR CI (95%)h | ||
Ethnicityd, h | ||||||||
Native/Western | 3865 | 3749 (97) ‡ | Ref | 3674 (98) | Ref | 863 (23) † | 813 (94) | |
Non-Western | 902 | 866 (96) ‡ | 1 (0.41–2.44) | 857 (99) | 0.71 (0.42–1.22) | 158 (18) † | 141 (89) | n.a |
Languagef | ||||||||
Fluent | 25,058 | 23,555 (94) ‡ | Ref | 21,811 (93) | Ref | 15,766 (72) ‡ | 14,015 (89) | Ref |
Limited/absent | 1748 | 1608 (92) ‡ | 1.92 (1.24–2.99) † | 1540 (96) | 1.41 (0.97–2.04) | 1,021 (66) ‡ | 921 (90) | 2.26 (0.17–30) |
CT combined test, FAS fetal anomaly scan, n.a. not applicable
Bold is significant: †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001
aPercentage based on the number of pregnant women that had an information offer about CT/FAS
bPercentage based on the number of pregnant women that desired counseling about CT/FAS
cPercentage based on number of pregnant women that was counseled about CT/FAS
dAdjusted for age, gravidity, parity, immigrant generation, urbanity and language proficiency
eThe ‘other’ ethnicity category, presented in different analyses in this article, is excluded from analyses due to uncertainty about Western and non-Western backgrounds because the country of birth of the parents of pregnant women is missing
fAdjusted for age, gravidity, parity, immigrant generation, urbanity and ethnicity
gChi2 testing
hLogistic regression analyses