Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr;184-185:127–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.01.025

Table 3.

ANOVA analysis of K data.

Classification Number of classes harmonized Percentage of the variation Number of classes airborne Percentage of the variation
SGU* (Table 2) 4 39% 4 28%
RGU* (Table 1) 12 48% 12 40%
EGU (§2.2.4) 17 55% 38 42%
WRBLV1*(§2.2.1) 8 41% 10 45%
TXSRFDO*(§2.2.1) 5 38% 6 39%
WRB/SGU* 15 52.98% 31 50.76%

(*) Available at European scale.