Table 2.
Normalisation Process Theory frequencies of agreement, total scores, and reliability coefficients (n = 59)
| Item | Mean | SD | Agree n (%) | Disagree n (%) | Neutral n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sense Making (coherence) | |||||
| I can see how pass the baton differs from usual ways of working | 3.3 | 0.9 | 29 (50.0) | 10 (17.2) | 18 (31.0) |
| Staff in this organisation have shared understanding of the purpose of pass the baton | 3.6 | 0.9 | 36 (62.1) | 8 (13.8) | 13 (22.4) |
| I understand how pass the baton affects the nature of my own work | 3.8 | 0.7 | 44 (75.9) | 3 (5.2) | 10 (17.2) |
| I can see the value of pass the baton for my work | 3.9 | 0.8 | 45 (77.6) | 3 (5.2) | 9 (15.5) |
| Cognitive participation | |||||
| There are key people who drive pass the baton forward and get others involved | 3.8 | 1.0 | 42 (72.4) | 7 (12.1) | 6 (10.3) |
| I believe that participating in pass the baton is a legitimate part of my role | 4.1 | 0.7 | 48 (82.8) | 1 (1.7) | 7 (12.1) |
| I am open to working with colleagues in new ways to use pass the baton | 4.1 | 0.5 | 49 (84.5) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (10.3) |
| I will continue to support pass the baton | 4.1 | 0.5 | 50 (86.2) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (10.3) |
| Collective Action | |||||
| I can easily integrate Pass The Baton into my existing work | 3.9 | 0.7 | 45 (77.6) | 1 (1.7) | 10 (17.2) |
| aPass The Baton disrupts working relationships | 3.8 | 0.9 | 4 (6.9) | 36 (62.1) | 15 (25.9) |
| I have confidence in other people’s ability to use Pass The Baton | 3.5 | 0.8 | 33 (56.9) | 6 (10.3) | 17 (29.3) |
| Work is assigned to those with skills appropriate to Pass The Baton | 3.1 | 0.9 | 18 (31.0) | 8 (13.8) | 30 (51.7) |
| Sufficient training is provided to enable staff to implement Pass The Baton | 3.4 | 0.9 | 29 (50.0) | 10 (17.2) | 17 (29.3) |
| Sufficient resources are available to support Pass The Baton | 3.6 | 0.8 | 34 (58.6) | 6 (10.3) | 16 (27.6) |
| Management adequately supports Pass The Baton | 3.7 | 0.8 | 36 (62.1) | 4 (6.9) | 16 (27.6) |
| Reflexive Monitoring | |||||
| I am aware of reports about the effects of Pass The Baton | 3.1 | 1.1 | 21 (36.2) | 15 (25.9) | 22 (37.9) |
| The staff agree that Pass The Baton is worthwhile | 3.4 | 0.8 | 27 (46.6) | 6 (10.3) | 25 (43.1) |
| I value the effects that Pass The Baton has had on my work | 3.7 | 0.6 | 36 (62.1) | 1 (1.7) | 21 (36.2) |
| Feedback about Pass The Baton can be used to improve it in the future | 4.0 | 0.6 | 48 (82.8) | 1 (1.7) | 9 (15.5) |
| I can modify how I work with Pass The Baton | 3.7 | 0.7 | 36 (62.1) | 3 (5.2) | 18 (31.0) |
| Total Scores | Mean | SD | 95% CI | Range | Alpha |
| Sense Making (coherence) (4–20) | 14.6 | 2.4 | 14.0–15.3 | 5–20 | 0.74 |
| Cognitive Participation (4–20) | 16.0 | 2.0 | 15.5–16.6 | 11–20 | 0.68 |
| Collective Action (7–35) | 25.1 | 3.9 | 24.0–26.1 | 14–34 | 0.72 |
| Reflexive Monitoring (5–25) | 17.9 | 2.7 | 17.2–18.7 | 12–25 | 0.71 |
aItem reverse scored