. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2017 Oct 16;17(2):403–417. doi: 10.1007/s10237-017-0968-5

Table 2. Comparison of the unloaded wall thickness t_o, unloaded volume V_o, volume expansion V-V_o, and compliance C between the two wall types.

Sample	Wall Type	t_o(mm)	V_o(mm³)	V–V_o(mm³)	C(ml/cmH₂O)
Adult02	I	0.52±0.02	170	414	0.0069
Adult03	I	0.61±0.04	166	446	0.0074
Adult04	I	0.46±0.05	182	460	0.0077
Aged05	I	0.66±0.03	143	317	0.0053

Average	I	0.56	165	409	0.0068

Std	I	0.09	17	65	0.0011

Adult01	II	0.66±0.03	115	138	0.0023
Aged01	II	0.72±0.03	129	116	0.0019
Aged02	II	0.85±0.02	214	291	0.0048
Aged03	II	0.92±0.04	245	293	0.0049
Aged04	II	1.12±0.04	151	80	0.0013

Average	II	0.85	171	184	0.0031

Std	II	0.18	56	101	0.0017

Table 2. Comparison of the unloaded wall thickness to, unloaded volume Vo, volume expansion V-Vo, and compliance C between the two wall types.