Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Dec 1;301(4):697–710. doi: 10.1002/ar.23728

Table 1.

Estimates of cell numbers and ratios in the cynomolgus monkey spinal cord

Isotropic Fractionator (IF)
Segment Cell # ±SD million range million nN % neuron % nNNR ± SD segment comparison p-value significant?
Cervical (c) 82.7 ± 18.2 68–103 74.3 25.7 3.0 ± 0.75 c. vs th. 0.26 n.s.
Thoracic (th) 118.0 ± 6.2 111–120 78.5 21.5 3.7 ± 0.42 c. vs lu. 0.75 n.s.
Lumbar (lu) 74.3 ±42.6 42–122 71.8 28.2 2.8 ± 0.92 c. vs th.+ lu. 0.71 n.s.

Total 275 ±55.5 230–337 74.9 25.1 3.2 ± 0.47

Stereology
Segment Cell # ± SD million range million glia % neuron % endo % GNR ± SD segment comparison p-value significant?

Cervical (c) 67.6 ± 15.6 49–78 66.9 10.4 22.6 7.3 ± 3.61 c. vs th. 0.41 n.s.
Thoracic (th) 89.7 ± 10.9 83–102 68.4 12.9 18.7 5.3 ± 0.85 c. vs lu. 0.25 n.s.
Lumbar (lu) 48.9 ± 7.9 40–54 61.3 16.7 22.0 4.2 ± 1.95 c vs th.+lu. 0.16 n.s.

Total 206.2 ± 31.2 172–334 65.5 13.3 21.1 5.6 ± 1.57

Abbreviations: c, cervical; endo, endothelial cell; GNR, glia-neuron ratio; lu, lumbar; nN, non-neuronal cell; nNNR, non-neuron to neuron ratio; n.s., not significant; SD, standard deviation; th, thoracic.