Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 27;57(2):451–462. doi: 10.1007/s00394-016-1328-4

Table 3.

Erythrocyte and plasma folate concentrations by sociodemographic variables and fruit and vegetable intake

Erythrocyte folate (nmol/L) Plasma folate (nmol/L)
n Median Q 1 Q 3 n Median Q 1 Q 3
All 282 460 419 540 294 14 10 19
Malea 124 480 424 559 127 13 10 18
Femalea 141 450 390 500 150 15 11 19
Female aged 18–44 y 61 440 380 481 66 14 11 18
p (sex) = 0.007 p (sex) = 0.019
p (female) = 0.070 p (female) = 0.380
Fruit and vegetable consumption
Fruit and vegetables <200 g/d 59 450 400 520 63 13 9.6 16
Fruit and vegetables 200–350 g/d 104 460 400 535 110 14 10 19
Fruit and vegetables 350–500 g/d 65 450 420 569 66 14 11 18
Fruit and vegetables >500 g/d 37 490 460 670 38 16.5 13 22
p = 0.016 p = 0.009
Income
Income < median 133 460 419 530 137 13 10 17
Income ≥ median 146 465 420 550 154 14 11 19
p = 0.260 p = 0.210
Level of education
Elementary school 26 445 420 540 30 12 9 17
High school 117 460 419 530 122 13 10 18
College or university 119 470 423 550 122 15 12 20
p = 0.600 p = 0.370

The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney rank sum test was used to test if sex, age, income, fruit and vegetable consumption or low-energy reporting affected status. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare if education level affected status

aData on gender are missing for erythrocyte folate (n = 17) and plasma folate (n = 17)