Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicology. 2018 Feb 7;396-397:54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.02.004

Table 1.

Effects of EE2 and BPA on splenocyte proliferation in response to LPS, PWM or anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation.

PND 90 PND 6 Month PND 1 Year



Activation Sex EE2 BPA EE2 BPA EE2 BPA
LPS F ↓0.5 N ↑0.05
↑0.5
N N ↑2500
M N N N N ↑0.5 ↑2.5
↑2500
↑25000

PWM F N ↓25000 ↑0.05 ↑25
↑2500
↓0.05 N
M ↓0.05 N ↓0.5 ↓2.5
↓250
↓2500
↑0.05
↑0.5
↑2.5
↑25
↑2500
↑25000

Anti-CD3/CD28 F N N N N ↓0.05 ↓2.5
M N N ↓0.5 N N N

F: female; M: male. N indicates no significant difference compared to control groups. ↑ indicates increase and ↓ indicates decrease. Numbers designate the dose levels (μg/kg bw/day) at which significant changes were observed.