Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 29;1:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.07.002

Table 4.

Results of generalized estimating equations models assessing the relationship between consideration of future consequences scores and both smoking status and high cigarette consumption (N = 1218).

Variable Smoking status
High cigarette consumption
B SE χ2 B SE χ2
Year −.03 .01 22.39⁎⁎ −.03 .01 9.68⁎⁎
Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFCS) −.01 .01 7.05⁎⁎ −.01 .01 1.05
Age −.01 .00 6.27 −.01 .00 2.86
Female −.04 .09 .16 −.09 .12 .62
Education level completeda −.05 .02 9.87⁎⁎ −.07 .02 13.86⁎⁎
Income .00 .00 .88 .00 .00 1.32
Unemployed (%) .38 .32 1.40 .67 .39 3.05
Retired (%) −.07 .14 .25 .31 .17 3.34
Disabled (%) −.27 .16 2.79 −.23 .22 1.15
Other (%) .15 .13 1.34 .63 .15 16.97⁎⁎
Household size −.02 .03 .51 .02 .04 .19
Level of urbanizationb −.06 .03 3.62 −.12 .04 8.38⁎⁎
a

0 = not yet attending any education; special (low-level) education; other sort of education/training/ apprenticeship, 1 = kindergarten/primary, 2 = continued primary education or elementary secondary education, 3 = continued special (low-level) education, 4 = pre-university education, 5 = junior vocational training, 6 = senior vocational training, 7 = vocational colleges, 8 = vocational colleges 2nd tier, and 9 = university education.

b

From 1 = very high degree of urbanization, to 5 = very low degree of urbanization.

⁎⁎

p < 0.01.

p < 0.05.