Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 5;11:1756286418759974. doi: 10.1177/1756286418759974

Table 1.

Correlations of HRUS and MRN-CSA with electrophysiological parameters (CMAP) and nT2, FA values. For the brachial plexus, correlation analysis has been performed with F-waves of the median nerve and for the lumbar plexus with F-waves from the tibial nerve. Significant correlations are marked.

CSA CV CMAP nT2 FA
HRUS – median p < 0.0001
r = − 0.85, n = 17
p = 0.08
r = − 0.34, n = 17
p = 0.11
r = 0.41, n = 16
p = 0.0002
r =0.87, n = 12
HRUS – ulnar p = 0.2
r = 0.4, n = 9
p = 0.4
r = 0.2, n = 9
p = 0.003
r = 0.72, n = 15
p = 0.05
r = −0.56, n = 12
HRUS – radial n.a. n.a. p = 0.6
r = −089, n = 15
p = 0.12
r = −0.42, n = 11
HRUS – tibial p = 0.45
r = −0.03 n = 15
p = 0.23
r = −0.17, n = 17
p = 0.5
r = − 0.16, n = 16
p = 0.89
r = − 0.03, n = 18
HRUS – fibular n.a. n.a. p = 0.09
r = 0.44, n = 15
n.a.
HRUS – brachial plexus p = 0.54
r = 0.20, n = 11
p = 0.023
r = 0.63, n = 13
n.a.

CMAP, compound motor action potential; CSA, cross-sectional area; CV, conduction velocity; FA, fractional anisotropy; HRUS, high-resonance nerve ultrasound; MRN, magnetic resonance neurography; n.a., not applicable; nT2, normalized nerve T2-weighted signal.