Table 4.
Coefficient of new eco-parent status for | B | Se | Beta | Sig. | Sig. (corr) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desire to increase greener lifestyle | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.02 | < .001 | .017 |
Strength of green lifestyle | − 0.03 | 0.04 | − 0.01 | .457 | |
Green lifestyle as ‘alternative’ | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.02 | .020 | .900 |
Leave TV on standby | − 0.07 | 0.08 | − 0.01 | .385 | |
Switch off unused lights | − 0.06 | 0.04 | − 0.01 | .166 | |
Turn off tap when brushing teeth | − 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.00 | .635 | |
Wear more clothes instead of more heating | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | .949 | |
Not purchase products with too much packaging | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.01 | .133 | |
Buy recycled paper products | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.01 | .034 | |
Take own shopping bags | − 0.05 | 0.06 | − 0.01 | .430 | |
Use public transport instead of car | − 0.08 | 0.05 | − 0.01 | .162 | |
Walk/Cycle short journeys | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.01 | .091 | |
Carshare with others | − 0.08 | 0.06 | − 0.01 | .241 | |
Take fewer flights | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.02 | .052 |
Note: Covariates of age, annual income and baseline view/behaviour not shown to conserve space. Original significance values given, with Holm-Bonferroni correction applied to significant results. Values set in italics indicate significant effects that remained after controlling for inflated error rates