Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 2;27(2):217–233. doi: 10.1007/s10646-017-1888-y

Table 3.

Richness and diversity of soil fungal communities

soil Cu spiked n OTU/sample OTU/treatment most abundant OTU H'
mg kg−1 %
D 0 2 62.5 ± 0.4 81 71.3 1.5 ± 0.42
50 3 62.7 ± 2.5 88 82.6 1.1 ± 0. 39
100 3 64.0 ± 4.2 88 85.8 1.0 ± 0.10
200 4 61.0 ± 1.8 84 56.8 1.8 ± 0.19
500 3 60.7 ± 6.3 81 73.0 1.3 ± 0.27
1500 2 57.5 ± 13.8 85 43.1 1.7 ± 0.13
5000 2 62.0 ± 2.8 80 29.5 1.7 ± 0.04
L 0 5 98.0 ± 2.5 137 43.9 2.4 ± 0.33
50 4 106.3 ± 2.5 135 18.3 2.8 ± 0.09
100 5 92.4 ± 3.0 136 23.4 2.5 ± 0.08
200 5 84.4 ± 1.0 118 31.1 2.4 ± 0.02
500 5 74.6 ± 0.2 120 56.3 1.7 ± 0.07
1500 5 72.6 ± 3.0 123 37.0 1.2 ± 0.20
5000 5 103.2 ± 3.3 140 24.1 2.4 ± 0.39

n: number of samples with sufficient reads for molecular analyses

OTU/sample: average number of OTU per sample ± standard error

OTU/treatment: number of OTUs per treatment after pooling of data from replicates

most abundant OTU: relative abundance in % of most abundant OTU in pooled data from replicates

H’: Shannon Index for fungal diversity in soil samples, average ± standard error from replicates