Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 11;168(1):249–258. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4514-z

Table 2.

Treatment recommendation according to RS%-designated risk category

Risk assigned using RS% All patients Centre 1 Centre 2 Centre 3 Centre 4
Endo Chemo Totals Endo Chemo Totals Endo Chemo Totals Endo Chemo Totals Endo Chemo Totals
Low 73
(49.0%)
14
(9.4%)
87
(58.4%)
20
(57.1%)
0
(0%)
20
(57.1%)
14
(70.0%)
0
(0.0%)
14
(70.0%)
28
(38.4%)
13
(17.8%)
41
(56.2%)
11
(52.4%)
1
(4.8%)
12
(57.1%)
Intermediate 22
(14.8%)
27
(18.1%)
49
(32.9%)
4
(11.4%)
7
(20.0%)
11
(31.4%)
0
(0.0%)
3
(15.0%)
3
(15.0%)
13
(17.8%)
14
(19.2%)
27
(37%)
5
(23.8%)
3
(14.3%)
8
(38.1%)
High 1
(0.7%)
12
(8.1%)
13
(8.7%)
0
(0%)
4
(11.4%)
4
(11.4%)
1
(5.0%)
2
(10.0%)
3
(15.0%)
0
(0%)
5
(6.8%)
5
(6.8%)
0
(0%)
1
(4.8%)
1
(4.8%)
Totals 96
(64.4%)
53
(35.6%)
149
(100%)
24
(68.6%)
11
(31.4%)
35
(100%)
15
(75.0%)
5
(25.0%)
20
(100%)
41
(56.2%)
32
(43.8%)
73
(100%)
16
(76.2%)
5
(23.8%)
21
(100%)

Data are presented for the whole study and individually for each centre. A total of 149/174 (85.6%) patient’s data were available for analysis (19 patients no treatment recommendation recorded, 6 were excluded for other reasons as detailed in the Results section); centre-specific case availability data are presented in Supplementary Table S1

Endo endocrine treatment only, Chemo endocrine treatment plus chemotherapy