Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 24;168(1):169–178. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4543-7

Table 3.

Prognostic value of the IHC4 score and clinicopathological clinical factors as assessed in univariate and multivariable analysis

Univariate Multivariableb (N = 350)
N HR 95% CI (HR) P HR 95% CI (HR) P
Age (year) (N = 430)
 < 65 257 1.00
 ≥ 65 173 1.37 0.85–2.21 0.20
Nodes (N = 395)
 Negative 193 1.00 < 0.001 1.00 <0.001
 1–3 N+ 143 1.92 1.02–3.64 1.59 0.79–3.20
 >3 N+ 59 6.13 3.29–11.43 4.24 2.11–8.55
Tumour size (cm) (N = 427)
 ≤ 1 52 1.00 < 0.001
 >1– ≤ 2 194 1.90 0.56–6.38 3.93 0.52–29.55 0.03
 >2– ≤3 127 3.63 1.09–12.05 5.23 0.69–39.53
 >3 54 6.47 1.91–21.88 9.11 1.19–69.91
Tumour grade (N = 384)
 GI 97 1.00 0.46
 GII 209 1.31 0.64–2.68
 GIII 78 1.68 0.74–3.84
IHC4a (N = 430) 430 1.01 1.00–1.01 0.03 1.00 1.00–1.01 0.07
Treatment (N = 430)
 Tamoxifen 208 1.00 1.00 
 Exemestane 222 0.95 0.59–1.53 0.83 0.87 0.50–1.53 0.64b

a The IHC4 score was calculated using the Cuzick et al. algorithm and comprised ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67

bThe multivariable model was adjusted for treatment group and was selected using a stepwise backward selection at the 10% level