Table 2. Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of ischemic stroke by FLI*.
| Model† | NAFLD (FLI >60) vs FLI <20 | FLI >90th Percentile vs Lower | Per 10 unit increment of FLI Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | |||
| All | 1.00 (0.69, 1.43) | 1.59 (1.02, 2.46) | 1.02 (0.97, 1.07) |
| Men | 0.67 (0.39, 1.17) | 1.26 (0.69, 2.30) | 0.96 (0.90, 1.03) |
| Women | 1.55 (0.98, 2.46) | 2.10 (1.15, 3.85) | 1.09 (1.02, 1.16) |
| p for interaction | 0.06 | 0.47 | 0.10 |
| Model 2 | |||
| All | 0.65 (0.43, 1.00) | 1.18 (0.68, 2.06) | 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) |
| Men | 0.50 (0.26, 0.96) | 0.75 (0.35, 1.60) | 0.90 (0.83, 0.97) |
| Women | 1.03 (0.58, 1.82) | 2.26 (1.14, 4.47) | 1.03 (0.95, 1.12) |
| p for interaction | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.14 |
* Hazard ratios shown in bold were statistically significant based on the confidence interval
† Model 1: adjusted for age, race, and age*race
Model 2: additionally adjusted for the Framingham stroke risk factors