Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;7:e31045. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31045

Table 2. Changes in brain regions (sampled as Hoechst + cells/section following the procedures outlined underneath the ‘Cell Counting’ subheading in the Materials and methods) sampled across experiments.

All power analyses were performed using G*Power (Peirce, 2008).

Experiment Region sampled
(Hoechst + cells/Section)
Significantly different? Test statistic P value Power (1-β error probability)
 Restraint (3–6 dpf) Forebrain No t9 = 1.018 0.3351 0.104
 Pallium No t5 = 0.4206 0.6915 0.054
 Subpallium No t5 = 1.685 0.1528 0.280
 Olfactory Bulb No t7 = 0.3330 0.7489 0.060
 Optic tectum No t8 = 1.664 0.1347 0.300
 Restraint (3–9 dpf Forebrain Yes (Control > Restraint) t11 = 3.890 0.0025 0.938
 Pallium Yes (Control > Restraint) t13 = 2.657 0.0198 0.704
 Subpallium Yes (Control > Restraint) t23 = 4.725 <0.0001 0.995
 Exercise (3–6 dpf) Pallium No t8 = 1.260 0.2430 0.199
 Subpallium No t7 = 1.435 0.1943 0.240
 Exercise (3–9 dpf) Pallium No t15 = 1.559 0.1397 0.310
 Subpallium No t19 = 0.2109 0.8352 0.055
 Physical vs. Visual stimulation (3–6 dpf) Pallium No F2,14 = 0.5679 0.5792 0.122
 Subpallium No F2,14 = 0.2594 0.7751 0.082
 AG1478 vs. DMSO (3 dpf) Pallium No t7 = 1.184 0.2751 0.170
 AG1478 vs. DMSO (6 dpf) Pallium No F3,79 = 1.852 0.1445 0.484