Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;19(1):101–114. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30694-0

Table 1.

Baseline Patient Demographics and Characteristics

EGFR FISH+ Patients All Patients
% (n) Control
(n=201)
+ Cetuximab
(n=199)
Control
(n=657)
+ Cetuximab
(n=656)
Age (median, range) 64 (34 – 84) 62 (37 – 80) 63 (30 – 86) 63 (19 – 84)
 >65 years 94 (47) 78 (39) 278 (42) 275 (42)
Sex
 Male 57 (115) 63 (125) 55 (359) 59 (385)
 Female 43 (86) 37 (74) 45 (298) 41 (271)
M-stage
 M1a 27 (54) 22 (43) 45 (297) 45 (292)
 M1b 73 (147) 78 (156) 46 (303) 46 (305)
Bevacizumab treatment
 Bevacizumab 40 (80) 44 (87) 42 (277) 43 (283)
 No Bevacizumab 60 (121) 56 (112) 58 (380) 57 (373)
Smoking History
 Current 44 (89) 47 (94) 45 (297) 45 (292)
 Former 47 (94) 44 (87) 46 (303) 46 (305)
 Never 9 (18) 9 (18) 9 (57) 9 (59)
Histology
 SC 28 (56) 28 (55) 25 (161) 24 (160)
 Adenocarcinoma 60 (120) 65 (130) 62 (408) 63 (411)
 Other* 12 (25) 7 (14) 13 (88) 13 (85)
Performance Status**
0 32 (64) 41 (81) 35 (229) 39 (256)
1 68 (137) 59 (118) 65 (427) 61 (400)
EGFR FISH Status
 EGFR-FISH+ 201 (100%) 199 (100%) 31 (201) 30 (199)
 EGFR FISH-negative     –     – 45 (293) 43 (283)
 EGFR FISH-unknown     –     – 25 (163) 27 (174)
*

Includes large cell, BAC, mixed, other, and not reported;

**

One patient on the Control arm was missing documentation.

In the control and cetuximab arms, EGFR FISH analysis failed in 4% and 5% of patients, there was inadequate specimen in 12% and 11% of cases, and there were no data in 9% and 10% of cases, respectively.