Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;19(1):101–114. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30694-0

Table 2.

Median progression-free and overall survival estimates for the entire study population and by EGFR FISH status

Analysis Group Outcome (mos) All Patients
Median (95% CI)
EGFR-FISH+
Median (95% CI)
EGFR-FISH-NP
Median (95% CI)

All Patients
OS
Cetuximab Arm 10·9 (9·5–12·0)
13·4 (11·5–14·8)
9·5 (8·2–10·9)
Control Arm 9·2 (8·7–10·3) 9·8 (8·7–12·1) 8·9 (8·4–10·2)


PFS Cetuximab Arm
4·6 (4·2–5·2)
5·4 (4·5–5·7)
4·4 (4 0–4 8)
Control Arm 4·5 (4 2–5·1) 4·8 (3·9–5·5) 4·3 (4·1–4·9)

Bevacizumab OS Cetuximab Arm 12·7 (10·9–13·4) 15·9 (13·4–19·1) 10·9 (9·1–12·5)
Control Arm 11·6(10·5–13·6) 13·2 (11·2–19·9) 11·2 (9·9–13·0)
PFS Cetuximab Arm 5·7 (5·3–6·1) 6·2 (5·7–8·0) 5·4 (4·6–5·8)
Control Arm 5·9 (5·5–6·7) 6·7 (5·7–8·0) 5·6 (5·3–6·4)

No Bevacizumab
OS Cetuximab Arm
9·2 (8·1–10·9)
11·2 (8·6–12·9)
8·4 (7·2–10·3)
Control Arm 8·1 (7·2–8·7) 8·7 (5·9–10·2) 8·1 (7·2–8·6)


PFS Cetuximab Arm
4·1 (3·5–4·4)
4·4 (3·8–5·2)
4·0 (3·1–4·3)
Control Arm 3·8 (3·1–4·2) 3·7 (2·8–4·6) 4·0 (3·0–4·2)

Squamous Cell Histology OS Cetuximab Arm 9·6 (8·2–11·5) 11·8 (8·6–13·5) 8·5 (6·4–10·4)
Control Arm 8·0 (7·1–8·8) 6·1 (4·2–8·7) 8·4 (7·2–9·9)

PFS Cetuximab Arm
4·2 (3·7–4·6)
4·5 (3·8–5·2)
4·0 (2·9–4·5)
Control Arm 3·7 (2·8–4·3) 2·8 (2·6–4·1) 4·1 (3·0–4·8)

Non-Squamous Histology
OS Cetuximab Arm
11·2 (9·6–12·5)
14·3 (11·4–17·7)
10·0 (8·4–11·7)
Control Arm 10·2 (9·0–11·2) 12·1 (9·7–13·8) 9·2 (8·5–10·8)


PFS Cetuximab Arm
5·1 (4·4–5·4)
5·7 (5·2–6·5)
4·6 (4·1–5·3)
Control Arm 4·9 (4·3–5·5) 5·5 (4·6–6·1) 4·5 (4·1–5·3)

Footnote: mos = months, NP = non-positive (includes EGFR FISH negative and EGFR FISH status unknown).