Table 1.
Contact | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
Characteristic | Index | HIV-infecteda n (%) |
HIV-negative n (%) |
HIV-status unknownb n (%) |
||
| ||||||
Total | 68 | 71 | 66 | 73 | ||
Reached for interview | 66 (97) | 68 (96) | 66 (100) | 14 (19) | ||
Sex | ||||||
Male | 58 (85) | 68 (96) | 58 (88) | 62 (85) | ||
Female | 10 (15) | 1 (1) | 7 (11) | 4 (5) | ||
Unknown/missing | 0 (0) | 2 (3) | 1 (2) | 7 (10) | ||
Age at investigation | ||||||
<30 years | 42 (62) | 44 (62) | 43 (65) | 28 (38) | ||
≥30 years | 26 (38) | 23 (32) | 22 (33) | 26 (36) | ||
Unknown/missing | 0 (0) | 4 (6) | 1 (2) | 19 (26) | ||
Race/ethnicity | ||||||
Black, non-Hispanic | 45 (66) | 51 (72) | 37 (56) | 37 (51) | ||
White, non-Hispanic | 21 (31) | 12 (17) | 24 (36) | 18 (25) | ||
Other/missing | 2 (3) | 8 (11) | 5 (8) | 18 (25) | ||
Region of residence / % with HIV sequences | ||||||
1 – Black Mountain | 7 (10) | / 71% | 5 (7) | / 0% | 10 (15) | 2 (3) |
2 – Charlotte | 25 (37) | / 68% | 29 (41) | / 52% | 21 (32) | 18 (25) |
3 – Winston-Salem | 9 (13) | / 56% | 5 (7) | / 80% | 6 (9) | 7 (10) |
4 - Raleigh | 14 (21) | / 50% | 15 (21) | / 60% | 3 (5) | 12 (16) |
5 - Fayetteville | 4 (6) | / 0% | 6 (8) | / 50% | 7 (11) | 1 (1) |
6 – Greenville | 6 (9) | / 50% | 2 (3) | / 100% | 11 (17) | 7 (10) |
7 - Wilmington | 3 (4) | / 33% | 3 (4) | / 33% | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
Out of State/unknown | 0 | 6 (8) | / 0% | 7 (11) | 26 (36) | |
HIV previously diagnosed | --- | 54 (76) | --- | --- | ||
Diagnosed ≥5 years agoc | --- | 21 (39) | --- | --- | ||
HIV RNA>1000 copies/mL or missingc,d | --- | 38 (70) | --- | --- |
Includes 20 second-degree HIV-infected contacts
Includes one second-degree contact with unknown HIV-status
Proportion of those with previously diagnosed HIV
HIV RNA viral load reported to the NC DHHS most closely to the time of index case investigation among the 54 contacts with previous HIV diagnoses
Some columns may not sum to 100% due to rounding