Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2017 Sep 12;89(2):495–508. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12952

Table 2.

Correlations between subtests on the CANTAB

CANTAB Subtest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
DMS pct correct all delays 1
DMS prob error given error −.70** 1
DMS mean corr latency .11 −.09 1
PAL mean errors to success −.43** .26** –.08 1
PAL Mean Trials to success −.45** .25** –.08 .94** 1
SOC prob solved in min moves .20* −.13 .01 −.27** −.30** 1
SWM Total errors −.46** .28** −.14 .24** .30** −.43** 1
SWM Strategy −.30** .24** −.11 .14 .17* −.26** .65** 1
ID/ED Total errors −.29** .12 −.01 .22** .27** −.06 .20* .16* 1

DMS: Delayed Matching to Sample; PAL: Paired Associates Learning; SOC: Stockings of Cambridge; SWM: Spatial Working Memory; ID/ED: Intra-dimensional, Extra-dimensional set shifting;

**

: p < .001;

*

: p < .05.