Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.021

Table 3.

Sensitivity of estimates of the per-protocol mortality hazard ratio for five years of treatment (95% confidence interval) to the choice of dose response model when emulating three target trials, The Health Improvement Network 2000–2010

Functional form for treatment a Target Trial (i): Statins versus no treatment Target Trial (ii): Statins and antihypertensives versus no treatment Target Trial (iii): Atorvastatin versus simvastatin
Cumulative dose – linear only 0.84 (0.70, 1.02) 0.85 (0.52, 1.12) 1.13 (0.85, 1.50)
Cumulative dose – linear and quadratic 0.87 (0.73, 1.03) 0.79 (0.42, 1.31) 1.18 (0.88, 1.52)
Cumulative average dose – linear only 0.81 (0.66, 0.97) 0.79 (0.48, 1.03) 1.14 (0.87, 1.46)
Cumulative average dose – linear and quadratic 0.91 (0.76, 1.07) 0.82 (0.35, 1.45) 1.16 (0.88, 1.43)
Cumulative dose in most recent 2 years and in the previous period – linear only 0.89 (0.70, 1.08) 0.85 (0.56, 1.28) 1.31 (0.92, 1.55)
Cumulative dose in most recent 2 years and in the previous period – linear and quadratic 0.92 (0.76, 1.12) 1.05 (0.46, 1.83) 1.23 (0.91, 1.62)