Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2017 Sep 12;48(7):1128–1138. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700263X

Table 4. Skin Conductance (μS) during the Stressful and Neutral Imagery Conditions.

PTSD Pairs (P+) Control Pairs (P-) Mixed-Model Analysis of Variancea

Exposed n=9 Unexposed n=9 Exposed n=12 Unexposed n=12 Diagnosis Trauma Exposure Interaction

Measure Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD F P F p F p
Stressful Condition
 Baseline SCL 4.19 4.22 3.82 1.75 3.92 2.49 3.54 2.33 0.07 .788 0.27 .609 0.00 .993
 Imagery SCL 4.17 4.31 3.97 1.75 4.03 2.51 3.68 2.26 0.05 .831 0.15 .708 0.01 .918
SCR (Imagery-Baseline) -0.02 0.13 0.14 0.34 0.11 0.28 0.13 0.43 0.23 .638 1.50 .235 0.92 .350

Neutral Condition
 Baseline SCL 3.94 4.09 3.73 1.79 3.64 2.37 3.10 2.13 0.23 .637 0.30 .588 0.06 .810
 Imagery SCL 4.08 4.17 3.78 1.77 3.81 2.59 3.33 2.26 0.13 .726 0.31 .583 0.02 .900
SCR (Imagery-Baseline) 0.15 0.14 0.05 0.11 0.18 0.32 0.23 0.30 1.83 .192 0.12 .728 1.04 .320

Difference Score: Stressful SCR-Neutral SCR -0.16 0.11 0.10 0.27 -0.07 0.42 -0.10 0.38 0.16 .695 2.92 .104 4.53 .047

Significant effects in bold

a

df=1,19

Abbreviations: PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; SCL, skin conductance level; SCR, skin conductance response