Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 23;65(11):1897–1904. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix666

Table 1.

Summary of Immune Responses Against Group B Streptococcus Serotypes

Serotype Day Placeboa GBS 0.5 μg GBS 2.5 μg GBS 5.0 μg
No. Value (95% CI) No. Value (95% CI) No. Value (95% CI) No. Value (95% CI)
GBS serotype Ia
 GMC Birth 73 0.49 (.34–.71) 75 6.66 (4.03–11.0) 76 6.52 (3.96–11.0) 69 12.0 (7.21–20.0)
 GMC D43 71 0.31 (.23–.42) 75 3.21 (2.01–5.13) 76 2.95 (1.85–4.70) 68 5.54 (3.38–9.06)
 GMC D91 75 0.38 (.29–.49) 71 1.97 (1.31–2.95) 75 2.22 (1.49–3.29) 64 2.78 (1.81–4.26)
 Ratio D43:Birth 68 0.67 (.58–.77) 74 0.51 (.44–.58) 75 0.47 (.41–.54) 68 0.45 (.39–.52)
 Ratio D91:Birth 71 0.81 (.63–1.05) 70 0.31 (.25–.39) 73 0.32 (.25–.40) 63 0.26 (.20–.33)
GBS serotype Ib
 GMC Birth 62 0.21 (.14–.32) 71 1.15 (.68–1.95) 71 1.72 (1.02–2.92) 66 1.39 (.81–2.40)
 GMC D43 69 0.15 (.11–.21) 72 0.73 (.47–1.14) 77 0.88 (.57–1.35) 67 0.67 (.42–1.07)
 GMC D91 76 0.50 (.39–.63) 74 0.85 (.61–1.18) 73 1.08 (.77–1.51) 66 0.83 (.59–1.19)
 Ratio D43:Birth 57 0.82 (.62–1.08) 69 0.61 (.51–.73) 70 0.59 (.49–.71) 64 0.52 (.43–.63)
 Ratio D91:Birth 61 2.40 (1.68–3.43) 69 0.76 (.53–1.08) 67 0.69 (.49–.99) 62 0.66 (.45–.95)
GBS serotype IIIb
 GMC Birth 52 0.29 (.19–.43) 57 2.11 (1.26–3.54) 64 2.30 (1.41–3.76) 58 1.72 (1.03–2.87)
 GMC D43 63 0.16 (.12–.22) 64 0.82 (.53–1.27) 75 0.88 (.59–1.31) 61 0.68 (.43–1.06)
 GMC D91 69 0.27 (.21–.34) 63 0.60 (.42–.85) 63 0.69 (.48–.98) 57 0.51 (.35–.74)
 Ratio D43:Birth 44 0.57 (.44–.73) 48 0.49 (.39–.62) 62 0.41 (.34–.50) 51 0.44 (.36–.55)
 Ratio D91:Birth 46 0.83 (.60–1.14) 45 0.35 (.24–.49) 53 0.29 (.21–.39) 47 0.32 (.23–.45)

Data are shown as antibody GMCs and GMC ratios at days 43 and 91 compared with baseline, by timepoint (per-protocol set).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; D, day; GBS, group B Streptococcus; GMC, geometric mean concentration; No., number of infants with available results in each group.

aGBS-specific antibody geometric mean concentrations at birth were negligible in the placebo group and therefore ratios for this group are unreliable.

bGBS-specific antibody concentrations were assessed by priority ranking, following the order Ia > Ib > III. Due to limitations in serum volume, it was not possible for all sera to generate final results in all 3 serotype enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.