Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 9;148(5):398–415. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx094

Table 1.

Relation Between In Situ Hybridization Signals and Block Age in Xenograft Tissues by Image Analysisa

Characteristic Block Age, y
0 1 2 5
PPIB
 Quartile
  1 (lowest) 2 (3.4) 4 (7.6) 12 (22.6) 39 (65.0)
  2 12 (20.3) 12 (22.6) 22 (41.5) 10 (16.7)
  3 18 (30.5) 19 (35.9) 14 (26.4) 6 (10.0)
  4 (highest) 27 (45.8) 18 (34.0) 5 (9.4) 5 (8.3)
P < .0001, χ2
MYC
 Quartile
  1 (lowest) 7 (11.7) 5 (9.4) 9 (17.0) 36 (60.0)
  2 11 (18.3) 14 (26.4) 24 (45.3) 7 (11.7)
  3 17 (28.3) 19 (35.9) 9 (17.0) 12 (20.0)
  4 (highest) 25 (41.7) 15 (28.3) 11 (21.0) 5 (8.3)
P < .0001, χ2
AR
 Quartile
  1 (lowest) 3 (5.1) 7 (13.2) 6 (11.3) 41 (69.5)
  2 11 (18.6) 14 (26.4) 25 (47.2) 6 (10.2)
  3 20 (33.9) 18 (34.0) 10 (18.9) 8 (13.6)
  4 (highest) 25 (42.3) 14 (26.4) 12 (22.6) 4 (6.8)
P < .0001, χ2
5.8S
 Quartile
  1 (lowest) 9 (15.3) 5 (9.4) 19 (35.9) 23 (39.7)
  2 14 (23.7) 16 (30.2) 17 (32.1) 9 (15.5)
  3 17 (28.8) 20 (37.7) 11 (20.8) 8 (13.8)
  4 (highest) 19 (32.2) 12 (22.6) 6 (11.3) 18 (31.0)
P < .0292, χ2

aValues are presented as number (column percentages) in each quartile across all three patient-derived xenographs examined.