Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;32(3):626–636. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.260

Table 5. Results from literature search.

Study Place Study type n Type of decompression Mean reduction in Hertel exophthalmometry (mm) New diplopia New numbness
Fat only decompressions (3.6–4.2 mm)
 Li et al7 Hong-Kong Case series 11 Patients (21 orbits) Orbital fat 4.2 mm 0% 0%
 Liao et al8 Taiwan Case series 22 Patients (44 orbits) Orbital fat 4.1 mm ND ND
 Wu et al9 Taiwan Case series 120 Patients (222 orbits) Orbital fat 3.6 mm 2.8% ND
               
Endoscopic approaches (2.1–8 mm)
 Lv et al10 China Case series 43 Patients (72 orbits) Endoscopic medial one-and-a-half wall 6.2 mm 12% ND
 Miśkiewicz et al11 Poland Prospective case series 14 Eyes Endoscoptic medial wall 1.0 mm 14% ND
 Kingdom et al12 USA Case series 77 Patients (114 orbits) Endoscopic three wall 3.2 mm 0% ND
 Thapa et al13 India Comparative case series 15 Patients (28 orbits) Endoscopic medial or medial one-and-a-half wall 3.4 mm 0% 0%
 Wu et al14 China Case series 108 Patients (206 orbits) Endoscopic medial wall 8.0 mm 23% 0%
 Gulati et al15 Norway Case series 37 Patients (66 orbits) Endoscopic medial wall 4.0 mm 19% 0%
 She et al16 Taiwan Case series 25 Patients (42 orbits) Endoscopic medial one-and-a-half wall 2.1 mm 4% ND
 Chu et al17 USA Case series 5 Patients (6 orbits) Endoscopic decompression of orbital apex 3.1 mm 0% ND
               
Nonendoscopic lateral (single) wall decompressions (3.6–4.8 mm)
 Miller18 UK Case series 41 Orbits Lateral wall 4.0 mm 6% 12%
 Ueland et al19 Norway Case series 84 Patients (144 orbits) Lateral wall 3.6 mm 5% 50%
 Nguyen et al20 USA Case series 69 Patients (108 orbits) Lateral wall 3.7 mm ND ND
 Mehta and Durrani4 UK Case series 17 Patients (21 orbits) Lateral wall 4.8 mm 0% 18%
 Sellari-Franceschin et al21 Italy Case series 39 Patients (72 orbits) Lateral wall 4.5 mm 0% 24%
 Chang and Piva22 Costa Rica Case series 33 Patients (65 orbits) Lateral wall 4.5 mm 3% ND
               
Nonendoscopic bony decompressions/articles presenting a mixture of types of decompression (1.9–7.2 mm)
 Yao et al23 USA Case series 73 Patients (115 orbits) Balanced two wall 5.0 mm 17% ND
 Choi et al24 Korea Case series 24 Patients (48 orbits) Balanced two wall 4.0 mm 2% 8%
 Wu et al 25 USA Case series 53 Patients (80 orbits) Balanced two wall 5.6 mm ND ND
 Kim et al26 Korea Case series 23 Patients (43 orbits) Balanced two wall or three wall 4.1  mm ND ND
 Korkmaz and Konuk27 Turkey Comparative case series 42 Patients (68 orbits) Balanced two wall (41 orbits) or three wall (27 orbits) 5.1 mm (2 wall) 7.2 mm (3 wall) 20% (2 wall) 29% (3 wall) ND
 Onaran et al28 Turkey Case series 36 Patients (72 eyes) Balanced two wall 6.2 mm ND ND
 Sagiv et al29 Australia and Israel Comparative case series 112 Patients (186 orbits) Two wall (89 orbits) or three wall (97 orbits) 4.6 mm (2 wall) 5.4 mm (3 wall) 13% ND
 Kim et al30 South Korea Comparative case series 21 Patients (33 orbits) Two wall (25 orbits) or three wall (8 orbits) 4.5 mm (2 wall) 5.1 mm (3 wall) ND ND
 Ponto et al31 Germany Case series 40 Patients (62 orbits) Two wall (27 orbits) or three wall (35 orbits) 3.0 mm 18% 52%
 Bingham et al32 USA Case series 4 Patients (8 orbits) Three wall 4.0 mm 0% ND
 Lee et al33 South Korea Comparative case series 55 Patients (90 orbits) Fat only (29 orbits), medial one wall (15 orbits), two wall (36 orbits), and two wall with minimal fat removal (19 orbits) 3.8 mm (orbital fat) 4.0 mm (medial one wall) 5.1 mm (2 wall) 3.4 mm (2 wall, minimal fat) 36% ND
 Roncevic et al34 Serbia Case series 65 Patients Three wall 7.2 mm 0% ‘Majority’
 Fayers et al5 UK Case series 98 Patients (163 orbits) Lateral wall (76 orbits) or lateral and medial and/or floor (87 orbits) 3.7 mm (lateral) 5.7 mm (all types) ND ND
 Clauser et al35 Italy Case series 131 Patients (196 orbits) Fat only decompression (137 orbits) or three wall bony decompression (59 orbits) 3.9 mm 4% ND
 Hill et al36 USA Case series 16 Patients (16 orbits) Medial wall 2.3 mm 22% ND
 Rocchi et al37 Italy Comparative case series 247 Patients Two wall (197 patients) or lateral (single) decompression (50 patients) 5.7 mm (2 wall) 4 mm (lateral) 18% (2 wall) 0% (lateral) ND
 Norris et al38 UK/USA/Australia Prospective multicentre case series 33 Patients (52 orbits) 6 orbits Fat only (6 orbits), lateral wall (13 orbits), balanced two wall (26 orbits), three wall (7 orbits) 2.8 mm (fat only) 4.8 mm (lateral) 4.4 mm (2 wall) 5.6 mm (3 wall) ND ND
 Alsuhaibani et al39 Saudi Arabia Case series 20 Patients (38 orbits) Balanced two wall 2.5 mm 45% ND
 Perez-Lopez et al40 Spain Case–control study 14 Patients (26 orbits) Medial one wall (4 orbits), balanced two wall (10 orbits), three wall (12 orbits) 2.5 mm (medial) 5 mm (2 wall) 7 mm (3 wall) ND ND
 Choe et al41 USA Comparative case series 17 Patients (28 orbits) Medial wall (18 orbits) Lateral wall (10 orbits) 3.1 mm (medial wall) 6.3 mm (lateral wall) ND ND
 Chu et al42 USA Comparative case series 69 Patients (112 orbits) External balanced two wall decompression (32 orbits), endoscopic medial one-and-a-half wall (32 orbits), combined endoscopic/external three wall decompression (48 orbits) 5.9 mm(external 2 wall) 1.9 mm (endoscopic medial 1.5 wall) 7.4 mm (endoscopic/external 3 wall) 0% (combined/external) 9% (endoscopic) ND
 Maalouf et al43 France Cross-sectional 19 Patients (36 orbits) Medial one-and-a-half wall 2.8 mm ND 20%
 O’Malley et al44 USA Case series 28 Patients (52 orbits) Medial one-and-a-half wall 3.3 mm 4% ND
 Mourits et al2 11 European centres Multi-centre case series 139 Patients (248 orbits) Variety of two wall and three wall approaches 5 mm ND Up to 36%
 Dubin et al45 USA Case series 24 Patients (45 orbits) Balanced two wall 6.2 mm 29.2% ND
 Jernfors et al46 Finland Case series (long-term outcomes) 78 Patients Medial one-and-a-half wall (mostly transantral, some endoscopic) 4.4–4.7 mm 8.5% 28%

Abbreviation: ND, not documented.