Table 2.
RBAL | RBMT | RAL | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITT analysis | 93/111 (83.8)a, b | 98/111 (88.3)a | 80/107 (74.8)b | 0.029* |
95% CI | 76.9–90.7 | 82.3–94.2 | 72.7–76.9 | |
Per protocol analysis | 93/102 (91.2)a, b | 98/106 (92.5)a | 80/101 (79.2)b | 0.017** |
95% CI | 85.7–96.7 | 87.5–97.5 | 71.3–87.1 | |
Compliance | 106/111 (95.5) | 102/111 (91.9) | 101/107 (94.4) | >0.05 |
95% CI | 91.6–99.4 | 86.8–96.9 | 90.1–98.8 |
Data are presented as n (%) with 95% CI. See Table 1 footnote for abbreviations.
p = 0.029, RBMT vs. RAL; p > 0.05, RBAL vs. RBMT; p > 0.05, RBAL vs. RAL.
p = 0.017, RBMT vs. RAL; p > 0.05, RBAL vs. RBMT; p > 0.05, RBAL vs. RAL.
Protocols within a row without a common superscript differ.
Protocols within a row without a common superscript differ.