Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Feb 14;93(3):291–299. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.11.018

Table 3.

Incidence rates of confirmed symptomatic kidney stones in Olmsted County from 1984 to 2012, by subgroups

Confirmed stone former subgroup IRRa (95% CI)
(per 5-year change)
P Estimated
Incidence Rate
(95% CI) in
1984b
Estimated
Incidence Rate
(95% CI) in
2012b
Absolute change in
Incidence Rate
from 1984–2012b
Stone Diameter
  ≤3mm 1.58 (1.52–1.65) <.001 7 (6–9) 99 (90–109) 92
  >3mm or unknown 1.11 (1.08–1.13) <.001 92 (86–99) 162 (152–172) 70
Stone location on imaging
  Pelvic/Lower pole 1.26 (1.19–1.34) <.001 6 (5–8) 24 (20–28) 18
  Ureteropelvic junction 1.47 (1.35–1.60) <.001 2 (1–3) 21 (17–25) 19
  Ureterovesical junction 1.29 (1.25–1.34) <.001 19 (17–22) 83 (76–91) 64
  Ureter 1.24 (1.20–1.28) <.001 26 (23–30) 90 (82–98) 64
Voided stone seen 1.08 (1.06–1.11) <.001 54 (49–59) 85 (78–92) 31
Infected stones 1.15 (1.03–1.28) .01 2 (1–4) 6 (4–8) 4
Stone Composition
  Unknown 1.28 (1.25–1.31) <.001 37 (34–41) 149 (139–159) 112
  COM 1.11 (1.07–1.14) <.001 38 (34–42) 67 (61–73) 29
  COD 0.96 (0.89–1.04) .33 8 (6–10) 6 (4–8) −2
  Hydroxyapatite 1.24 (1.16–1.32) <.001 6 (5–8) 21 (18–25) 15
  Uric Acid 0.94 (0.84–1.05) .24 4 (3–6) 3 (2–4) −1
a

Adjusted rates calculated using the age and sex distribution of the US 2010 census

b

Incidence rate per