Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 22;74(4):455–464. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2404-2

Table 3.

Predictions of fluconazole inhibition on siponimod pharmacokinetics using SimCYP ADME simulator version 9 (i, ii, iii) or version 16 (iv) and comparison with observed in vivo results

Trial no. (dose regimen) Fluconazole Siponimod AUC/D (h ng/mL)/mg AUC (h ng/mL) CL/F (L/h) AUCi/AUC C max,i/C max
Day 1 Day 2 till the last day
i 200 mg qd 200 mg qd 5 mg, day 4 249 1245 4.01 1.97 1.09
ii 200 mg bid 200 mg qd 5 mg, day 3 255 1273 3.93 2.43 1.10
iii 400 mg bid 400 mg qd 4 mg, day 3 257 1028 3.89 3.42 1.11
iv 200 mg bid 200 mg qd 4 mg, day 3 272 1089 3.71 2.15 1.07
in vivo* 200 mg bid 200 mg qd 4 mg, day 3 280 1110 3.59 1.97 1.10

Siponimod-predicted PK parameters are geometric mean of 70 virtual individuals; SimCYP version 9 was used for trials i to iii, and version 16 was used for trial iv. The CV% of the in vivo study is reported in detail in Table 2 of the companion manuscript (EJCP-17-D-17-00482). The CV ranges for the four simulations are C max ratio (2–5%), AUC ratio (10–23%), CL/F (45–60%), AUC (41–59%) and AUC/D (41–59%), respectively

AUC area under the concentration–time curve, AUC i area under the concentration–time curve under fluconazole inhibition, bid twice a day, CL/F apparent systemic clearance, C max maximum plasma concentration, D dose, qd once a day, T max time to maximum plasma concentration, T 1/2 terminal half-life