Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;9:1045. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03309-6

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Evaluation of phosphorylation-optimized MS2- and MS3-based TMT methods. a Colored peaks illustrate MSn peak selection. MS2 analysis either took place in the orbitrap (OT) or ion trap (IT). Ion selection for MS3 analysis was based on synchronous precursor selection (SPS) or neutral loss (NL)-triggered peak isolation. In the multiple charge state (MC) method, the MS3 isolation width was decreased for higher charge states. IT, OT and OT MC used multi-stage activation (MSA) with neutral loss mass 97.9673 Da. b Heatmap of correlation slopes of the 5% highest and lowest log2 ratios for all replicates. U2OS cells were treated 2 h with 5 µM doxorubicin (DOX) or DMSO (C). The resulting TMT sample was measured on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos three times as technical replicates with each quantification method. c Bar plot showing the total number of quantified phosphopeptide DOX vs. C ratios per method for all replicates. d Violin plot showing log 10 signal-to-noise ratio distributions of the TMT reporter ions with the median marked as a dash