Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;9:1045. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03309-6

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

3D multiple regression model-based calculation of phosphorylation stoichiometry. a Phosphorylation stoichiometry can be extracted by feeding phospho-, non-phospho- and protein-intensity data into a 3D multiple regression model (3DMM). More detailed explanations are given in Supplementary Note 1. b For benchmarking stoichiometry calculation via MS2- and MS3-based TMT, yeast and HeLa phosphopeptides were each half dephosphorylated with Rapid alkaline phosphatase. Yeast phospho- and non-phospho-peptides were then diluted in fixed ratios to create samples with set phosphopeptide stoichiometry, and added to equal amounts of HeLa phospho- and non-phospho-peptides serving as a contaminating background. The sample was measured three times as technical replicates each with MS2- and OT MC MS3-based TMT quantification. In this setup, protein intensities were set to 1 in the 3DMM. c 3DMM-extracted p-values describing the significance of the slope being non-zero were correlated against the difference of MS2- and MS3-estimated stoichiometry vs. the true value of 10%. d Scatter plots showing estimated stoichiometry determined in TMT MS2 and MS3 mode, with three different levels of 3DMM p-value cutoffs. e Mean squared errors were calculated as a sum of positive bias and variance for all replicates of both MS2- and MS3-based TMT at different 3DMM p-value cutoffs