Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;12:27. doi: 10.1186/s13065-018-0397-2

Table 4.

Comparison of LOQs for 16 PAHs achieved by GC–HRMS, GC–MS/MS and GC–MS

Analytes GC–HRMS GC–MS/MS GC–MS
LOQ, (ng/CFPa) Estimated LOQ, (ng/cig) LOQ, (ng/CFPa) Estimated LOQ, (ng/cig) LOQ, (ng/CFPa) Estimated LOQ, (ng/cig)
Naphthalene 0.51 0.026 1178.71 58.94 108.17 5.41
Benzo[c]phenanthrene 0.04 0.002 ND ND 66.80 3.34
Benzo[a]anthracene 0.03 0.002 38.57 1.93 38.11 1.91
Chrysene 0.04 0.002 50.13 2.51 49.61 2.48
Cyclopenta[c,d]pyrene 0.02 0.001 48.84 2.44 60.04 3.00
5-Methylchrysene 0.04 0.002 ND ND 2.48 0.12
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.04 0.002 11.44 0.57 5.08 0.25
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.05 0.003 12.41 0.62 5.07 0.25
Benzo[j]aceanthrylene 0.09 0.005 ND ND ND ND
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.04 0.002 5.01 0.25 3.03 0.15
Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 0.02 0.001 5.46 0.27 1.54 0.08
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.07 0.004 0.83 0.04 1.48 0.07
Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene 0.05 0.003 ND ND ND ND
Dibenzo[a,e]pyrene 0.04 0.002 0.80 0.04 0.28 0.01
Dibenzo[a,i]pyrene 0.06 0.003 1.33 0.07 ND ND
Dibenzo[a,h]pyrene 0.07 0.004 2.99 0.15 ND ND

ND analyte not detected in the sample

a20 cigarettes per CFP were smoked under ISO smoking regime