Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 20;19(2):230–248. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12285

Table 2.

Slope of the best‐fit line between %GP of various gamma criteria and MLC errors

Slope of the best‐fit line
Treatment QA device Method Case Acceptance criteria
3%/3 mm 3%/2 mm 3%/1 mm 2%/2 mm
IMRT EPID Absolute gamma analysis 1 −5.15 −7.84 −12.10 −8.80
2 −4.69 −7.15 −11.16 −8.80
3 −4.63 −7.07 −11.12 −8.03
4 −4.25 −6.72 −10.61 −7.77
5 −2.60 −4.52 −8.99 −6.74
VMAT EPID Absolute gamma analysis 1 −2.14 −3.44 −5.44 −3.69
2 −1.70 −2.64 −3.81 −2.54
3 −2.07 −3.44 −5.61 −3.67
4 −1.75 −2.81 −4.79 −3.05
5 −1.91 −3.13 −5.42 −3.22
VMAT EPID Relative gamma analysis 1 −0.01 −0.14 −1.64 −0.42
2 −0.01 −0.09 −0.73 −0.20
3 −0.05 −0.19 −1.85 −0.42
4 −0.07 −0.19 −1.46 −0.36
5 −0.02 −0.11 −1.03 −0.17
IMRT MapCheck2 Absolute gamma analysis 1 −1.34 −2.83 −6.36 −5.52
2 −0.30 −0.77 −2.10 −1.68
3 −0.73 −1.71 −4.70 −3.28
4 −0.53 −1.41 −1.30 −3.08
5 0.01 −0.06 −1.06 −0.57
VMAT ArcCheck Absolute gamma analysis 1 −3.78 −5.33 −6.33 −4.87
2 −0.28 −0.55 −1.08 −1.28
3 −3.64 −5.57 −6.60 −5.92
4 −0.64 −1.17 −2.04 −2.96
5 −1.06 −2.21 −3.18 −3.38