Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 20;19(2):230–248. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12285

Table 3.

A comparison of the AUC values for various gamma criteria for different QA devices

AUC [standard error, 95% confidence interval]
Treatment QA device Method Acceptance criteria
3%/3 mm 3%/2 mm 3%/1 mm 2%/2 mm
IMRT EPID Absolute gamma analysis 0.930
[0.016, 0.898–0.962]
0.952
[0.013, 0.927–0.978]
0.992
[0.005, 0.982–1]
0.950
[0.014, 0.923–0.977]
VMAT EPID Absolute gamma analysis 0.958
[0.031, 0.897–1]
0.965
[0.036, 0.895–1]
0.970
[0.031, 0.910–1]
0.933
[0.065, 0.805–1]
VMAT EPID Relative gamma analysis 0.629
[0.101, 0.431–0.826]
0.740
[0.078, 0.588–0.892]
0.966
[0.022, 0.923–1]
0.766
[0.074, 0.620–0.912]
IMRT MapCheck2 Absolute gamma analysis 0.590
[0.042, 0.505–0.667]
0.610
[0.039, 0.532–0.686]
0.669
[0.040, 0.589–0.745]
0.723
[0.035, 0.655–0.792]
VMAT ArcCheck Absolute gamma analysis 0.694
[0.105, 0.442–0.853]
0.701
[0.105, 0.448–0.860]
0.735
[0.106, 0.476–0.892]
0.722
[0.101, 0.473–0.867]