Table 5.
The EQD2‐based gEUD values (gEUDEQD2) of integrated EBRT and HDR are compared with overall D2cc for each volume optimization, adaptive/conformal HDR plans, and Point A HDR plans
| D2ccEQD2 [GyEQD2] | gEUDEQD2 [GyEQD2] | P‐value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std Dev | Max | Mean | Std Dev | Max | ||
| Conformal HDR Plan | |||||||
| Rectum | 64.3 | 7.5 | 80.9 | 52.2 | 5.7 | 64.1 | <0.0001 |
| Bladder | 82.9 | 9.2 | 95.3 | 53.5 | 5.3 | 67.5 | <0.0001 |
| Sigmoid | 65.7 | 5.7 | 75.9 | 56.1 | 4.6 | 68.5 | <0.0001 |
| Point A HDR Plan | |||||||
| Rectum | 70.3 | 10.8 | 93.0 | 55.3 | 5.9 | 72.0 | <0.0001 |
| Bladder | 90.2 | 12.2 | 115.1 | 56.0 | 4.3 | 64.8 | <0.0001 |
| Sigmoid | 74.3 | 14.2 | 122.3 | 60.8 | 6.7 | 79.1 | <0.0001 |